go back 
dvd archive
cd archive
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
F
|
G
|
H
|
I
|
J
|
K
|
L
|
M
|
N
|
O
|
P
|
Q
|
R
|
S
|
T
|
U
|
V
|
W
|
X
|
Y
|
Z
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
0
| |
| Original Title |
X2 |
| Director |
Bryan Singer |
| Genre |
Action, Thriller, Adventure, Sci-Fi |
| Released |
2003-04-24 |
| MPAA Rating |
Rated PG-13 for sci-fi action/violence, some sexuality and brief language. |
| Rated |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| Already living in a society that mistrusts them, the mutants are faced with even more discrimination after an unforeseen enemy - who may be a mutant with extraordinary powers - launches a devastating attack. The news of the assault causes a public outcry against the mutants, including renewed support for the Mutant Registration Act, and William Stryker, a military leader rumored to have experimented on mutants (possibly including Wolverine), is among the most vocal supporters of the legislation. Stryker puts into motion a plan to eradicate the mutants and begins an offensive on the X-Men mansion and school. Magneto, having escaped from his plastic prison, forms an unlikely alliance with Professor Xavier to stop Stryker. Meanwhile, Wolverine heads north to investigate his past. |
| |
| |
| Patrick Stewart as Professor Charles Xavier , Hugh Jackman as Logan/Wolverine , Ian McKellen as Eric Lensherr/Magneto , Halle Berry as Storm , Famke Janssen as Jean Grey , James Marsden as Scott Summers/Cyclops , Anna Paquin as Rogue , Rebecca Romijn-Stamos as Mystique , Brian Cox as William Stryker , Alan Cumming as Kurt Wagner/Nightcrawler , Bruce Davison as Senator Kelly , Aaron Stanford as John Allerdyce/Pyro , Shawn Ashmore as Bobby Drake/Iceman , Kelly Hu as Yuriko Oyama , Katie Stuart as Kitty Pryde |
| |
| |
Well, they're definitely united…
The original X-Men was a cool action movie with great special effects,
excellent characters, awesome fight scenes, and, my personal favorite, some
highly effective comic relief. Consider, for example, some of the stuff in
the first film, such as the scene where Wolverine proves to Cyclops that
he's really himself and not Mystique disguising herself as him, or when he
tells Cyclops that someone else is in the room with them and to `keep his
eye open.' Classic stuff, and as was the case in the original movie, the
comic relief in the follow-up is great, and most of it comes from
Wolverine.
It's interesting to consider the fact that the movie tends to try to satisfy
both its evolutionist audience as well as its creationist audience (the
latter of which obviously makes up a considerably smaller portion of the
audience). Nightcrawler is a great character, although after the opening
fight scene (arguably the best scene in the entire film) he changes into a
completely different character almost immediately. I was looking forward to
seeing him as a wonderfully effective villain (at this point I'd like to
remind you that I am not familiar with the X-Men comics and so don't know a
lot about the characters beyond what's in the movies). I even loved the
sound effects that were made when he would disappear and reappear somewhere
else. It was strange that he kicked so much ass in the opening scene and
then turned out to be completely timid.
Besides being an interesting character, Nightcrawler is the one in which the
majority of the faith-based content of the movie is concentrated. It is well
known that evolution is based entirely on observable facts and is totally
open to change when new revelations and discoveries are made, while
creationism is based entirely on faith (and, it might as well be noted, on
ignoring observable facts). It's interesting to watch as the movie tends to
switch back and forth between the two, seeming at first to be almost a fight
for screen time by screenwriters of different ideologies but turning out to
be a revelation that faith and evolution are not opposites, but can work
together.
Evolution is a fact, we KNOW that it is true, and X-Men takes the formula
and uses it to make a great action movie. The dangerous line that it walks
is that is provides creationists, people who are notorious for taking
evolutionary theory and mutilating and distorting it completely beyond
recognition in a desperate attempt to make it look ridiculous. It is not
going to be any surprise to see hordes of creationists who will latch on to
something like X-Men and accuse evolutionists of thinking that X-Men is some
sort of documentary-style, non-fiction account of the generally accepted
current state of human `evolution.' I would like to take this opportunity to
laugh in advance.
It should be obvious that this is a movie made for entertainment purposes,
even if only by the fact that not all of the `mutants' are, in fact,
mutants. Wolverine, for example, was created by a human (not a God, by the
way), as was his worthy adversary near the end of the film. But as far as
taking enormous liberties with evolutionary theory, it should be noted that
the movie also makes extensive efforts to clarify the way that evolution
really works, although it leaves out the small detail that the X-Men are a
massive exaggeration.
In comparison with the original movie, X2 was a hugely entertaining and
well-made action film, just like X1, but it is the story that has evolved
more than anything else. I loved the introduction of a new bad guy who
forced the X-Men to come together, although the movie did tend to trip over
itself at some points, such as with the paper-thin content of the meaning
and need for the little boy with the freaky tongue.
(spoilers)
I was disappointed with the fate of Jean Grey, even if only because her
`death' was so avoidable. It was never explained very clearly why she didn't
stay on the jet and use all of her energy to lift the jet itself out of the
path of the oncoming water instead of getting off and trying to levitate the
jet while stopping the water at the same time. Even if exiting the jet was
absolutely necessary, there is really no fathomable reason why, given the
fact that she held the water back that long and was ultimately able to stop
her efforts at lifting the jet, she could not let the water gradually come
to her and slowly engulf her so that she could swim and wait for the jet to
come back and pick her up.
At any rate, if her death was necessary for furthering the story or for
preparing for the next film (the creation of a third X-Men is an absolute
certainty, after all), then I suppose I can understand it, but making Jean's
death necessary and making it believable are two of the weakest parts of the
film. On the positive side, however, Hugh Jackman was given the opportunity
to prove his effectiveness in performing emotionally charged scenes while
playing a comic book character (which is certainly a daunting
task).
Speaking of weak parts of the film, by the way, there is also Magneto's
escape. Not only does Mystique inject a massive amount of `iron' into the
body of one of Magneto's prison guards without killing him (there are VERY
few things that can be injected directly into the blood stream in that
quantity without resulting in almost immediate death, and iron in ANY form
is NOT one of them), but Magneto also manages to latch on to all of that
iron and pull it out of the guard's body, using the nice little
ball-bearings that he gets out of him to escape. However, even the most
basically educated members of the audience, who realize that the iron in
your blood is not exactly metal, will probably appreciate the way this was
pulled off (that is, of course, if they were able to see the screen enough
while repeatedly slapping their foreheads in disbelief).
I have never been into comic books, I don't think I've ever even seen a copy
of an X-Men comic, but even coming into the films completely new like that I
enjoyed both of them and I think they were both remarkably well-made. It is
a sign of deserving respect when a movie or series of movies based on comics
books or cartoons or old TV shows or something can entertain an audience
that is not familiar with the original material (this is not true for
example, according to Roger Ebert, of the recent Scooby-Doo film, which I
have yet to see or develop any interest in seeing).
With that in mind, I think it would be appropriate to end by emphasizing the
sheer broadness of the target audience. Kids will love the characters and
the fighting and special effects, high school and college age kids will
appreciate the same things as well as the intricacy of the story (adults
will more than likely appreciate this as well), and, as was the case with
the first film, just about every male in the audience of any age and sexual
orientation will appreciate the astronomical hotness of Mystique, which
translated from the first film to this one quite well. I don't have much to
say in defense of the little stunt that Magneto pulled in pulling the `iron'
out of the guard's blood in order to escape, although even that was
convincingly done. As with all movies, X2 has its faults, but it is
definitely a worthy follow-up to the original, which was something of a
tough act to follow.
|
| |
| |
 |
|