go back 
dvd archive
cd archive
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
F
|
G
|
H
|
I
|
J
|
K
|
L
|
M
|
N
|
O
|
P
|
Q
|
R
|
S
|
T
|
U
|
V
|
W
|
X
|
Y
|
Z
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
0
| |
| Original Title |
You've Got Mail |
| Director |
Nora Ephron |
| Genre |
Comedy, Romance |
| Released |
1998-12-18 |
| MPAA Rating |
Rated PG for some language. |
| Rated |
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| A modern day remake of "Shop Around The Corner" with Ryan and Hanks playing people who work in rival stores, hate each other by day, but discover each other over the internet, unknowingly. |
| |
| |
| Tom Hanks as Joe Fox , Meg Ryan as Kathleen Kelly , Greg Kinnear as Frank Navasky , Parker Posey as Patricia Eden , Jean Stapleton as Birdie Conrad , Steve Zahn as George Pappas , Heather Burns as Christina Plutzker , David Chappelle as Kevin Jackson (as Dave Chappelle) , Dabney Coleman as Nelson Fox , John Randolph as Schuyler Fox , Deborah Rush as Veronica Grant , Hallee Hirsh as Annabelle Fox , Jeffrey Scaperrotta as Matthew 'Matt' Fox , Cara Seymour as Gillian Quinn , Katie Finneran as Maureen, the Nanny |
| |
| |
The curse of the 107 minute movie.
STAR RATING:*****Unmissable****Very Good***Okay**You Could Go Out For A Meal
Instead*Avoid At All Costs
Maybe it's just me,in fact I'm certain it is,but it always seems to me like
movies that have a running time of 107 minutes seem to go on forever.I
cannot really name a single instance when this has'nt been so.It's like
there's this curse meaning movies of this length are going to feel like 1007
minutes,in fact,it's got to the stage where I always brace myself,for
whenever I watch a movie of this length,man,I brace myself for one long
movie.
Take Nora Ephron's cast for cast follow up to Sleepless In Seattle.It starts
off like a promising,engaging yarn.Then it begins to dramatically lack flair
and not be very funny.But still,it engages.Then,finally,the ending just
slumbers on.
Now,don't get me wrong.I enjoy romantic comedies.I liked Notting Hill and
Sleepless In Seattle very much,in fact I now own a copy of each.This
particular romantic outing,however,was not one of my favourites.And I like
Tom Hanks the actor very much.There are some instances,e.g. Saving Private
Ryan,when I think he's the next Dustin Hoffman.But I did'nt find the
charecter he portrayed here to be very convincing or strongly written at
all.What a waste of a talented actor.Obviously a big pay cheque did the
deed.
This,of course,is the latest in a long line to add to the growing list of
Warner Brothers 75th anniversary stinkers.Well done guys,keep this up,you'll
be having a millenium dumpsite party.**and a half.
|
| |
| |
 |
|